Introduction: The Two Pillars of Investigation
Welcome to the foundational craft of investigation. As an aspiring investigator, the skills you develop in interviewing and interrogation will be the two essential pillars upon which your success is built. While they are related, they are distinct disciplines with different goals, mindsets, and techniques. Understanding this difference is the first step toward mastery.
- Interview: This is the process of learning facts from individuals who have knowledge of a situation but are not implicated in the wrongful act itself. Think of victims, witnesses, or complainants.
- Interrogation: This is the process of learning facts and, crucially, obtaining an admission or confession from individuals who are implicated in the wrongful act.
This guide will demystify these core skills, providing a practical and structured foundation for your journey into the world of professional investigation.
1. The Art of the Interview: Gathering the Facts
1.1. The Goal and Mindset of an Interviewer
The primary goal of an interview is simple and direct: to learn the facts. Your subjects—be they complainants, victims, or witnesses—hold pieces of the puzzle. Your role is not to judge or accuse, but to be a considerate, understanding, and impartial fact-finder. You are there to listen, to guide their recollection, and to assemble an accurate picture of what happened. A successful interview yields clear, unbiased information that forms the bedrock of your case.
1.2. Your Blueprint for Success: How to Prepare
Professionalism begins long before you ask the first question. A well-prepared investigator is an effective one. Skipping this stage leads to repetitive questions and a disorganized conversation that can confuse the interviewee and damage your credibility.
- Thorough Planning Careful, deliberate planning is essential. It ensures your interview has a clear focus and logical flow, which prevents you from having to circle back and ask the same questions repeatedly. This respects the interviewee's time and makes the information you gather far more coherent.
- Case Review Before you meet with anyone, you must thoroughly review every development in the case. Walking into an interview with a complete command of the existing facts demonstrates professionalism and allows you to ask more insightful, targeted questions.
- Understand the Interviewee People are not interchangeable sources of information. Consider the person's specific relationship to the case (complainant, victim, witness) and any background information available, such as their education, character, and habits. This context helps you tailor your approach and build rapport more effectively.
- Outline Key Facts Prepare a list of the pertinent facts and key details you need to develop during the conversation. This is not a rigid script, but a guide to ensure you cover all necessary ground and leave the interview with the information you need.
1.3. Adapting Your Approach: Interviewing Different People
Your approach must adapt to the role and emotional state of the person you are interviewing.
Interviewing the Complainant
When speaking with the person who made the initial complaint, you must remain considerate, tactful, and impartial. It is critical to set aside any personal feelings about the complainant's potential motives and focus solely on gathering the facts of their complaint.
Interviewing the Victim
Victims, especially in crimes of violence, are often in a heightened emotional state. It is crucial to approach them with understanding and sensitivity. Be aware that victims may hold strong but unsupported beliefs about the crime, and you will need to navigate these perceptions carefully to separate fact from assumption.
Interviewing the Witness
Your primary role when interviewing a witness is to assist them in recalling events exactly as they were observed. Emotions can significantly affect memory; a frightened witness may recall an event very differently than a calm one. Your job is to help them reconstruct their observations patiently and accurately.
This process of general fact-finding is essential, but sometimes an investigation requires a more focused approach to uncover the truth from someone directly implicated in the act.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The Science of Interrogation: Seeking the Truth
2.1. The Goal and Mindset of an Interrogator
Where the interview seeks to gather information, the interrogation seeks to obtain an admission or confession. This is a profound shift in objective. The primary goal is to learn facts from an implicated person, secure a confession, and ultimately obtain a written, signed, and witnessed statement that can be corroborated with physical or other evidence. To succeed, you must master a variety of questioning techniques, learn to accurately judge the psychological stress and weaknesses of others, and strategically take advantage of your own abilities in questioning any suspect or reluctant witness.
2.2. A Foundational Technique: The Direct Approach
One of the primary techniques in an investigator's toolkit is the Direct Approach. It is a straightforward and powerful method for specific situations.
- What it is: A direct question that assumes the subject's guilt.
- When to use it: This approach is reserved for situations where the investigator is already reasonably certain of the subject's guilt based on other evidence.
- Example: Instead of asking, "Did you steal the money?", you would ask, "Why did you steal the money?" This question is designed to move past denial and directly to motivation.
Whether conducting a fact-finding interview or a direct interrogation, your ability to understand and control non-verbal communication is a universal and indispensable skill.
3. The Universal Skill: Reading and Using Body Language
3.1. Why Your Body Language is Your Most Important Tool
As an investigator, you are constantly communicating, even when you aren't speaking. Your own non-verbal cues—your posture, eye contact, and gestures—can be used to build rapport, project confidence, and control the tone of the conversation. At the same time, learning to read a subject's body language can provide valuable clues about their sincerity, emotional state, and potential deception. It is a skill that amplifies your effectiveness in every interaction.
3.2. Projecting Confidence: Your Body Language Toolkit
How you carry yourself sends a powerful message. Use the following guide to ensure your body language reflects professionalism and control.
Technique | Actionable Advice for Investigators |
Facial Expression | Use polite, friendly smiles, but don't overdo them. Vary your expression to show interest. Avoid a blank stare, which can convey hostility. |
Eye Contact | Maintain steady eye contact, broken by definite looks away. Look more when listening and less when talking. Avoid staring, which is intrusive. |
Distance | Keep an appropriate distance. Leaning in too close can seem domineering, while being too far away can convey a cold impression. |
Posture | To show you are attentive, lean forward with a straight spine and open arms. Avoid slumped shoulders and folded arms, which convey a lack of interest. |
Gestures | Use gestures to add emphasis to your speech. Avoid fidgeting, hand-wringing (which shows anxiety), and foot-tapping (which shows irritation). |
3.3. Reading Others: An Introduction to Detecting Deception
Reading body language is not an exact science, and no single cue is proof of a lie. However, being aware of certain patterns can help you detect insincerity and guide your questioning. While a subject can consciously control their facial expressions, their hands and autonomic responses (like blinking and pupil dilation) are far more difficult to manage, making them more reliable indicators of insincerity. Treat these as potential indicators that warrant further exploration, not as definitive proof.
- Hand Movements: Pay close attention to a subject's hands, as they are especially reliable cues. Deceptive people may show a noticeable decrease in simple hand movements, consciously trying to keep them still or hidden. Conversely, they may show an increase in self-touching behaviors, such as touching the nose, stroking the chin, or brushing a hand across the mouth.
- Reduced Blinking & Pupil Dilation: The eyes are very difficult to control consciously. Two of the most consistently observed non-verbal signs of deception are a reduction in the rate of blinking and the dilation of the pupils.
- Closed Postures: When people disagree with what is being said, they often adopt "closed" postures. Watch for arms folded tightly across the chest and legs crossed above the knee.
Conclusion: Your Journey as an Investigator
You have now learned the essential distinctions between an interview and an interrogation—the two pillars of your craft. The interview is an art of impartial fact-gathering, while the interrogation is a science of obtaining a confession. Underpinning both is the universal skill of reading and using body language to build rapport and detect insincerity. Mastering these skills requires practice, patience, and a deep understanding of human nature. Your journey as an investigator is just beginning, and with these principles as your guide, you are well-equipped to seek the truth.
Made with Bullet